How Dual-Strike XISEM thinks about evidence (infographic)
Most security stacks blur three jobs into one noisy alert stream. Dual-Strike XISEM separates them on purpose — so your analysts investigate with context, not panic.
Collect — neutral facts only
XISEM Agents, Anti-Venom Secure Access, and Gateways (Microsoft 365, EDR, PSA, identity, network) deliver timestamped evidence. They do not render verdicts. They do not enforce access. They prove what happened on a device, in a browser, or in a cloud tenant.
Examples of collection (not interpretation):
• Agent posture harvest at check-in
• Browser session domain + duration from Anti-Venom
• Entra sign-in success/failure
• SentinelOne or CrowdStrike detection export
• ConnectWise ticket status change
Interpret — correlation and policy
The Dual-Strike XISEM platform correlates evidence across sources:
• COBRA² detection logic (rules, baselines, drift)
• ASPIRE posture scoring across six pillars
• Conditional Access intelligence at the client org level
• Compliance mapping to 100+ frameworks with control linkage
• MIP identity lifecycle and NHI governance signals
Evidence alone is never a verdict. Interpretation produces posture, detections, and compliance gaps — still advisory until a human or approved workflow acts.
Decide — analyst and operator actions
The console is an investigative surface, not an autonomous enforcer:
• Asset modal — timeline, matrices, extension health, pivots
• Threat Center — triage, assign, PSA ticket, remediate
• Investigations — case narrative with evidence chain
• Reports — executive binders and audit exports
Gateway destinations close the loop: detection → ticket → technician work → status sync back into XISEM.
Why this matters for MSPs
When you onboard a client, you are not buying another alert generator. You are buying one correlated story across agent, browser, identity, and EDR — with compliance and CA context baked in.
Start here: dual-strike.com · Support wiki → Platform overview
Illustration uses anonymized demo tenant names only.