Compliance that works every day
Government and defense-industrial cybersecurity has a calendar problem.
Most programs can assemble a binder for an assessment window. Fewer can answer — today — whether they are audit-ready against the frameworks they contracted, which controls fail with proof, and which remediations will move posture this sprint.
Authorizing officials want trajectory. Assessors want evidence. Operators want actions. Spreadsheet POA&Ms and annual screenshot archaeology satisfy none of them for long.
Dual-Strike XISEM for Government (XISEM GOV) is the cyber operations platform for that reality: discover, secure, measure, and continuously prove compliance posture across mission systems, identities, endpoints, and enclaved workloads.
One platform to discover, secure, measure, and continuously prove compliance posture across every mission system, identity, endpoint, and enclaved workload.
Explore: dual-strike.com/solutions/government
The government problem in plain language
Agencies, state programs, and Defense Industrial Base contractors drown in point tools. Each tool owns a slice of truth. None owns the program narrative.
The failure mode is predictable:
• NIST and CMMC readiness lives in a GRC spreadsheet that lags live systems by months.
• FedRAMP-family and StateRAMP programs scramble between 3PAO milestones instead of operating posture every day.
• Privileged access is still standing admin because “the maintenance window required it.”
• Browsing and SaaS risk — including Shadow AI and exfiltration-oriented behavior — sits outside the compliance story for Controlled Unclassified Information and export-sensitive work.
• When an assessor asks for proof, the answer is a folder of screenshots with no provenance chain.
XISEM GOV is not another SIEM that only stores logs, and it is not a GRC tool that only tracks policies. It turns live telemetry into defensible control evidence, plans of action and milestones (POA&M), and assessor-ready binders — every day.
GRC tracks intent. XISEM feeds evidence. They complement.
Built for framework-first missions
Government buyers are measured against frameworks — not feature lists. XISEM GOV maps evidence already in the platform to the programs those missions live under:
• Program pressure: ------------------ · Meet: ------ · Exceed: --------
• Program pressure: NIST CSF / SP 800-53 / SP 800-171 · Meet: Live control mapping and daily evidence against the frameworks your program contracts · Exceed: ASPIRE™ / MAVICE℠ trajectory an authorizing official or CISO can defend — not annual screenshot archaeology
• Program pressure: CMMC Levels 1–3 · Meet: Level-scoped packs, POA&M, and readable evidence chains for CUI environments · Exceed: Ranked remediation that moves assessor outcomes this sprint — not spreadsheet theater
• Program pressure: FedRAMP / GovRAMP / StateRAMP / TX-RAMP · Meet: Framework operations, binders, and accreditation-status tracking between 3PAO milestones · Exceed: Continuous posture without claiming an authorization Dual-Strike has not officially attained
Framework center of gravity: NIST CSF 2.0 · NIST 800-171 · NIST 800-53 · CMMC L1–L3 · FedRAMP · GovRAMP · StateRAMP · TX-RAMP · ITAR-supporting program controls · DFARS cyber expectations
Meet the frameworks. Exceed the binder scramble.
What an authorizing official actually needs
Framework-first compliance
Select the contracted set — NIST CSF, 800-171, 800-53, CMMC, FedRAMP-family packs — and operate against that set with evidence refreshed daily. Framework mapping only hurts when it is a January spreadsheet. Tie controls to live telemetry and compliance becomes a running program, not a fire drill.
POA&M and binders with provenance
Remediation needs owners, due dates, and proof. XISEM GOV generates POA&M from live control failures and packages assessor-ready binders with mappings, evidence, and provenance — so the package is a product of operations, not a weekend of archaeology.
Secure Elevate — least privilege you can defend
Standing administrator rights are a recurring finding and a recurring incident path. Secure Elevate eliminates standing admin and replaces it with just-in-time elevation with evidence for privileged workflows — the kind of access story an assessor and a program security officer can both accept.
Secure Resolve and Secure Access — endpoint and browsing risk in the compliance story
Secure Resolve blocks phishing, malware, and malicious domains at the endpoint. Secure Access (Anti-Venom Secure Access) surfaces browser extensions, Shadow AI, risky SaaS, and exfiltration-oriented browsing — including signals that matter for CUI and export-sensitive environments.
Endpoint and browser risk are not “IT hygiene side quests.” They are control evidence.
ASPIRE™ and MAVICE℠ — executive truth with drill-down
ASPIRE™ answers technical posture. MAVICE℠ answers maturity. Together they support the questions authorizing officials, CISOs, and boards actually ask:
• Are we audit-ready against our contracted frameworks today?
• Which controls fail, and what evidence proves it?
• What are the top remediations that move CMMC / NIST posture this sprint?
• Can we show continuous improvement to an AO, 3PAO, prime, or board?
Vendor scores without evidence are theater. Scores with drill-down to readable proof are a management system.
Readable evidence doctrine
Assessors and analysts should not be asked to decode raw JSON as the primary story. XISEM presents human-readable, complete evidence — labeled fields, structured detail, full pertinent facts. Raw JSON remains available as an audit appendix, not the default narrative.
That doctrine matters when a C3PAO or agency reviewer opens the console. They get evidence chains and binders — not an opaque vendor dashboard as the only artifact.
Siloed mission tenancy
Client and agency data stays siloed. Attribution is enforced at write time. Managed service provider rollups must not bleed one mission’s identities, events, or assets into another. Isolation is not a UI filter; it is a platform rule.
FedRAMP journey surfaces — honest by design
XISEM GOV includes accreditation-status tracking and compliance POA&M surfaces for executive reporting between 3PAO milestones. That is operational support for a FedRAMP-oriented journey.
It is not a claim that Dual-Strike is FedRAMP authorized unless that status is separately attained and published. We support FedRAMP-oriented operations and evidence. Authorization status is separate — and we will not pretend otherwise.
ITAR-supporting controls — not a legal determination engine
For export-controlled programs, XISEM GOV supports the program security story: identity hygiene, least privilege, endpoint controls, and browsing / exfiltration-oriented signals with defensible audit evidence.
Legal ITAR determinations stay with counsel and the Empowered Official. The platform supports the controls; it does not replace the legal determination.
Designed for operators, not alert theater
A Cyber Operations Platform does three jobs well:
1. Discover the mission footprint — assets, identities, SaaS, endpoints
2. Secure with Elevate / Resolve / Access — least privilege and endpoint / browsing risk
3. Prove with daily evidence, POA&M, binders, and ASPIRE / MAVICE trajectory
Logs are inputs. Evidence is the product. Action is the outcome.
That is why XISEM GOV fits agencies, DIB primes and subcontractors, state and local programs under GovRAMP / StateRAMP / TX-RAMP pressure, and government-focused MSPs who cannot afford another console that only pages people.
What we do not claim
Public-sector buyers deserve precision:
• We do not claim FedRAMP authorization Dual-Strike has not officially attained.
• We do not issue ITAR licenses or legal determinations.
• We do not replace agency SOC-as-a-service mandates or official PMO / ATO packages.
• We do not position XISEM as “instead of” your EDR, identity provider, or GRC system — we extend and operationalize evidence those systems produce.
Who this is for
• CISOs, ISSOs, and compliance managers who live under NIST / CMMC calendars
• Authorizing officials, CIOs, and program executives who need trajectory, not theater
• Defense Industrial Base primes and subcontractors protecting CUI
• State and local programs under GovRAMP / StateRAMP / TX-RAMP expectations
• C3PAOs, systems integrators, and government MSPs / MSSPs who need readable evidence packages
Next step
If your program can pass an assessment week but cannot prove readiness on an ordinary Tuesday, start here:
dual-strike.com/solutions/government · Contact government sales · Request a demo
Audit-ready today. Every day.
— The Dual-Strike team